Sunday, 25 October 2009
Thursday, 22 October 2009
I am going to write this based on what I see, heard and concluded. So at the end of this article, please tell me if I am wrong or correct.
About 2 years ago, a friend e-mailed a video link of a man on the phone mentioning names of people in the Judiciary. I instantly recognised the man as VK Lingam. (Much later, there was a second video link of the second half of the conversation.) But I am not a 1Video Forensic Expert, so I could be wrong.
In the conversation, I can hear discussion about getting a Tan Sri-ship to the receiver of that call. The man who looked and sounded like VK Lingam had insisted that the receiver of that tele-conversation should get his Tan Sri ship as soon as possible. But I am not a 1Video Forensic Expert, I could have heard wrongly.
Then as I walked out of my office room, I informed my other partners to watch the Video. We laughed at the amount of time this person who sounded and looked like VK Lingam, said the word ‘Correct, Correct, Correct’. But we were also very upset as the Video looked and sounded like a recording of a man fixing up Judicial Appointments of Judges in Malaysia. But then again, I am not a 1 Video Forensic Expert, I may have heard wrongly.
Later, I found out many members of the Malaysian Bar watched this Video, and the lawyers were so upset, that over 2,000 of us handed a memorandum to the Prime Minister demanding a Royal Commission to get to the bottom of this. I was part of that peaceful march and my friend Lee Shih and I were right at the back of that group that morning.
I also recall when a few of us were planning the walk, Lim Chee Wee, George Varghuse and I visited Putrajaya on the Sunday before the Walk, where the 2 gentleman walked from the Palace of Justice to the PM’s Office at Putrajaya, to gauge the distance so that to prepare the walk that week. I was lucky, I did not have to walk that Sunday - Chee Wee asked me to drive his car and wait for him and George at the end of their walk.
But the thought that lingered in my mind as we did our simulated Walk that Sunday was “Is it wrong for us to Walk?”
We then had the Royal Commission where I was asked by Lawasia, an International organisation of Lawyers based in Australia, to attend the Hearing on a watching brief. I watched and heard the testimonies of many people. Some were defensive, some clearly had something to hide, and some were just cocky and dismissive. But my feelings as I listen to the Hearing, was that something was definitely wrong, and that it was likely that the man in the video was in fact VK Lingam. But I am just 1 small Malaysian, I may be wrong.
I thought I was correct at that time. But obviously, I must have been wrong. Despite 2,000 of us who marched that day at Putrajaya, the thousands of comments and articles condemning the content of that Video and more importantly the damning hearing and eventual Report by the Royal Commission; our 1Government - through the 1 and only Public Prosecutor - have today announced that the VK Lingam case is closed and no prosecutions will be carried out.
So, now you can see what I said earlier, I made 1 too many wrong conclusions above. I must be wrong, wrong, wrong as I was clearly not correct, correct, correct.
Wednesday, 21 October 2009
Monday, 19 October 2009
Thursday, 15 October 2009
It seems to me, Malaysian leaders don’t care about their credibility, once they reach the level of leadership.
It seems to me, Malaysian leaders are thick and will go against their very own words, just to stay in power.
Credibility of a leader, may not be the most essential characteristic of a leader, but definitely a crucial factor is helping voters for this person. A person, who is more credible, will more likely get the nod.
We now see Ong Tee Keat going against his own words that he will resign if he lost the Vote of No Confidence Motion at the EGM last 10th October 2009. Tee Keat lost. Whether by one vote or by 1000 votes, a loss is a loss. Had he won by one vote, it is also the same, a victory is a victory irrespective of the margin.
Tee Keat’s decision to stay on as President of the MCA despite his clear and unequivocal words that he will resign is he lost the motion of No Confidence has made him less credible. How are we to trust a man who cant even keep his own words?
But this is a trait common among Barisan Nasional leaders. People who have lost credibility still have the thick skin to demand to stay on.
I recall Najib explaining that Isa’s suspension from UMNO for money politics is merely a technical matter and asked that Isa be given a second chance. Najib asked the people to give Isa a 2nd chance.
But I must say this Mr. Prime Minister - if a man is convicted of a crime, society should consider giving the man a 2nd chance, but when a politician holding posts which involves public accountability, public funds and public utilities, the person must be as credible as possible. Former involvement in corrupt practices will taint his credibility.
The same applies for Tee Keat. He lost the motion of no confidence, and he has said it himself that he will go if he lose. So, as far as I am concern, Tee Keat has lost his credibility by choosing this course of action.